01 December, 2011

WESTERN COUNTER INSURGENCY EXPERTS ON US COUNTER INSURGENCY OPERATIONS IN AFGHANISTAN

AN EMINENT WESTERN COUNTER INSURGENCY EXPERT ON US COUNTER INSURGENCY OPERATIONS  IN AFGHANISTAN



Don't worry - many US soldiers have been treated to these tactical/practical realities: i.e., at the fb 'Restrepo' in the Korengal - (side valley - Kunar region across from Mohmand territory - approx.) the soldiers there told US news services that they were amazed at the physical dexterity/endurance of the fighters they were opposing as they had watched them scale a multi-thousand foot mountain in cheap plastic flip-flops in under half an hour! We have to train our boys to endure whereas the local tribesman is born to endurance; - the very idea of us 'out-toughing' them on their own turf was preposterous from the outset - a notion founded in purblind arrogant ignorance!

 

These problems are well known to any discerning military mind and trainer but again, when we need to be making our troops a lot hardier, political parlour games (i.e., so as to permit female participation) are denuding training of any serious rigor - and the Pentagon openly admits this claiming that with all the hi-tech gear we have now soldiers don't need to be as strong as they used to be which, of course, is ludicrous. The critical thing that those born to hardship have over us is simply that - they take hardship in their stride - it's part of their everyday life - sleeping on the cold slope of some ridge in Afghanistan or in Waziristan - with only their clothing to keep them warm (along with their butts dug into a hole in the ground) is entirely normal and thoroughly acceptable to a tribesman but to our guys it is something exceptional - it's not the norm even when they have done some training to prepare them for that. The great strength of the poor, the meek and lowly of this earth is that they know how to suffer whereas the fat cats do not and thus I believe the Good Book is entirely correct when it states that the meek will inherit the earth (because, for one thing, the rich and greedy will have murdered each other off [LoL]).

 

As you have probably gathered by now - I have always had an enormous respect for the Afghan/Pakistan tribesman their scouting, skirmishing and rifle skills are second to none  - we could learn a lot  from them but, sadly, we won't owing to the silly belief that we think we are smarter because we have a bunch of gadgets.

 


Subject: FIGHTING THOSE FARM BOYS ON THIER HOME - GOOD LUCK!

 

xyz


:  I have been in a number of areas where I would not want the local people to be my enemy.  We Westerners tend to spend most of the day on our arse, while in many places the people are on their feet most of the day trying to survive. 

 

  • When I was in El Salvador, the camposinos were like mountain goats - I was young, tough, pumped iron, had played football in college - and there was no way I could keep up with them.
  • When I climbed to 16,000 feet in the Rwenzori Mountains/Mountains of the Moon - after one day stubbornly carrying a 40-50 pound pack to about 7,000 feet - against the advice of the Bakonjo, I knew I could not make it another 7 days and humbly gave up my pack to carry a light day pack, while fat Stanley left me in the dust carrying a heavy pack, and runners were sent up and down the mountains to bring the guys cigarettes
  • The Baka Pygmies I hunted with in Cameroon used to tell me, we are the Kings of the Forest.  The day we wish to revolt, no government soldier can catch us in the forests of the Congo Basin.  They ran through the forest like duikers, while every branch and spine snagged my clothes and they had to cut a path for me so I could make my way
  • Hunting bongo with the Tikar Hunters of Kong, Cameroon, I couldn't carry the bongo skin 50 yards that Ouagga carried for 20 km

America/Europe and even South Africa are no longer the countries of farm boys that fought in WWI, WWII and in the case of South Africa also the Anglo-Boer Wars or the more recent bush wars.  And today, even the farm boys in these countries spend most of their time sitting on tractors and in air-conditioned combines - unlike in developing countries where they hoe the ground by hand or with an ox//mule driven plow. We are soft, as you say & rely on high tech and that will only get you so far.

 

When you fight a guy who can go all day with little or no water or food, who you are fighting in his backyard, who can drink out of a waterhole that would make you sick, when you are carrying a 60 pound pack with your food/survival gear and all he has is an AK47 and ammo, when the local villagers will feed and house him - you've lost the war before it started - the elements/terrain and spirit of the people are against you - you are in their garden and they don't need a GPS or compass and most importantly both psychologically and physically they are superior.  Your officer may be highly educated, but one must remember, your are born with an intelligence and you get an education - plenty of smart people who never made it to school and I would hate to fight them on their own turf.  I have always said, in Africa, if I had to fight a bush war - give me a team of rural poachers over the best trained soldiers.  My hunting buddy in South Africa - Peter Nieuwoudt was in 32 Battalion for 4 years in the Angolan Bush fighting the Cubans and Russians - these are the kind of guys he was with, sleeping in a shallow hand-dug pit each night, no fires, living off the land and some dropped rations - and they handed it to the Cubans/Russians!

 

We are only kidding ourselves in Afghanistan, even with the supply routes open - unless we wish to be there forever, and if what I suspect is unfolding as we train proxy armies in Burundi, Uganda, Kenya and Ethiopia and now likely Nigeria - probably many places I am not aware of - if they destabilize these areas as They (our Western Governments - not the people - the System is broken and no longer represents the man in the street) have in Afghanistan and if They think They can send in a bunch of young boys from suburbia to fight the locals on their home turf - they are in for a rude awakening!

 

xyz

 

It takes no great wit to realize that the war in Afghanistan has always been dangling by a strategic thread that can be snapped at any time the slightest whim so moves the Pakistani government! Forget even the Russian land links - without the port of Karachi - very few heavy war materials/supplies (i.e., such as fuel, afv's, replacement parts, etc.) can reach US/NATO forces and certainly not anywhere near the quantity necessary to maintain the US way of war which, btw, has always been tail-heavy (i.e., at least ten guys in the rear {and probably a great deal more] with goodies to maintain one trigger-puller up front). The whole campaign, from its inception, has been a thinking man's (i.e., a strategist's) nightmare as it was utterly dependent on an ambivalent ally - on a very good day; and on a bad day? Well just look at Torkham, etc. On a very, very bad day when the Pakistani Government/Army decide the whole venture is going to cost them their very existence - the war, effectively, will be turned off! The trouble with the US modern gadget way of fighting war is that it is absolutely dependent on a massive supply chain to keep all the whirligigs going and, moreover, it has hidebound US military planning to a set of blinkered, managerial rules and regulations which always revolve around tactical details (i.e., they are kept perpetually focused on the tactical 'trees' while being forced to ignore the strategic 'forest' [in Agha's excellent words - US strategic thought is a barren woman]). Any general-staff officer of the old Prussian school of, let's say, 100 years ago would have taken one look at the strategic lay of the land and how any potential conflict would be fought there and then laugh at any such idea for a long-term successful campaign. Put another way, Afghanistan was and is 'fool's gold' - it glitter and attracts the eye of the modern western military man as it appears to be a place where modern gadget-force can win at virtually no cost to the aggressor but such vanity ignores the country's land-locked nature and, more importantly, the nature of its people. There have been several instances where the hi-tech tools were not available to US and NATO forces, such as at some of the British Platoon-House fights in Helmand and American outposts in the Kunar area and, as a result, the troops that fought there developed a very healthy respect for their lightly-armed but highly mobile opponents. One of the great ironies here being that, while their ground troops were being stale-mated in running gun battles with Mohmands and related kin in the Kunar area -the Pentagon types actually talk about taking the ground-battle fight to the Waziris Mahsuds!???? Well, if you can't beat the 'B' team fighters of this region how in hell are you going to do anything at all against the 'A' team????? The profound stupidity and arrogance of current Pentagon military thought leaves one picking one's jaw off the floor - in a sort of dazed, incredulous shock. I say this because it would seem that the British experience of over 100 years of fighting in this area has been utterly ignored as if the rules simply do not apply to the US because they have some computerized gadgets? But in the end - the gadgets fail or cannot be brought to bear where they need to be in time and some sharp-shooting Mahsud, with little to no education other than an unmatched mountain fighter's skill/cunning, plugs a well-educated US officer with a 50 rupee bullet (perhaps less) and, once again, Kipling's 'Frontier Arithmetic'  insists on having its way.

 

xyz



 



http://www.scribd.com/doc/61839666/Indo-Pak-Wars-A-Pictorial-History

http://www.scribd.com/doc/21686885/TALIBAN-WAR-IN-PAKISTAN-AFGHANISTAN-A-WRITERS-PERCEPTIONS-FROM-2001-TO-2011

http://www.scribd.com/doc/22457862/Military-Decision-making-and-leadership

http://www.scribd.com/doc/22151765/History-of-Pakistan-Army-from-1757-to-1971-PRINTING-ENABLED-Do-acknowledge-to-the-author

http://www.scribd.com/doc/22455178/Letters-to-Command-and-Staff-College-Quetta-Citadel-Journal

http://www.scribd.com/doc/23150027/Pakistan-Army-through-eyes-of-Pakistani-Generals

http://www.scribd.com/doc/23701412/War-of-Independence-of-1857

http://www.scribd.com/doc/22107238/HISTORY

http://www.scribd.com/doc/21693873/Indo-Pak-Wars-1947-71-A-STRATEGIC-AND-OPERATIONAL-ANALYSIS-BY-A-H-AMIN-THIS-BOOK-CAN-BE-PRINTED-FROM-THIS-SITE

NATO-GCC Slouching towards Catastrophe in & around Syria

FROM AMBASSADOR GAJENDRA SINGH




 NATO-GCC Slouching towards Catastrophe in & around Syria

 US ,UK ,France and Saudi led GCC monarchies are fishing for trouble in Syria and along its Mediterranean coast .It is arousing the Iranians ,a very nationalistic and proud people to a level of revolutionary frenzy similar to 1979 , when US embassy was broken into and occupied .Something similar has now happened with the British embassy .Brits are always the stalking dogs of war for Washington . Western leaders have gone crazy and leading the world towards may be a WW111 , I hope not .

Russia is standing along with Syria and from behind China too.

Turkey under its hotheaded PM Erdogan under Saudi money and influence is following an utterly intemperate policy and will come to grief.There are simmering tensions withe the Turksih military.

 Below articles and extracts on the situation . Gajendra 1 December 2011

Showdown, Club Med style Asia Times by Pepe Escobar 2 Dec 2011.

Extracts

In its mad rush to sell the Turkish political model to the majority-Sunni parts of the Arab world (yet the GCC is not buying), Turkey may be severely miscalculating its crucial relations with both Russia and Iran. Around 70% of Turkey's energy is imported from Russia and Iran. Not to mention that both Russia and Iran are fuming with Turkey bowing to NATO pressure to host a radar station as part of missile defense. 

Russia has very clear ideas about the Syrian scenario. The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has been more than explicit for weeks now; ''We absolutely do not accept a scenario of military intervention in Syria.'' 

Last week's meeting of the deputy foreign ministers of the emergent BRICS group (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa), in Moscow, was unmistakable. 

The BRICS essentially drew the red lines. No excuse whatsoever for a foreign intervention in Syria, as in ''any external interference in Syria's affairs, not in accordance with the UN Charter, should be excluded.'' No ''bomb bomb Iran''; instead, dialogue and negotiations. And no additional sanctions, deemed ''counterproductive''. The BRICS clearly see how the Libya scenario is slowly morphing into the modified NATOGCC war. 

To add extra sauce, the aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov - equipped with nuclear missiles - has already left Murmansk towards the Eastern Mediterranean, alongside the destroyer Admiral Chabanenko and the frigate Ladny. They will arrive at the Tartus naval base, in Syria, in mid-January, and will be met by other ships from the Russian fleet in the Black Sea. 

Tartus, hosting around 600 military and technicians from the Russian Defense Ministry, is a center of maintenance and refueling for the Russian Black Sea fleet. It will be a thrill to watch whether the Russians will invite members of the George H W Bush Carrier Strike Group - now also in the Eastern Mediterranean - for a volleyball match. 

It's fair to argue that masses of Syrians want something other than the Assad regime - but certainly not some variant of humanitarian bombing, not to mention civil war. They saw NATO's legacy in Libya - virtually the whole infrastructure of the country destroyed, cities bombed to dust, tens of thousands of dead and wounded, al-Qaeda-linked fanatics wielding power in Tripoli
, widespread ethnic hatred. They don't want a brand new massacre. But NATOGCC does. 

 Even before this news from Brussels, the French satirical weekly Le Canard Enchaine - as well as the Turkish daily Milliyet - had already revealed that commandos from French intelligence and the British MI6 are training the FSA in urban guerrilla techniques, in Hatay in southern Turkey and in Tripoli, in northern Lebanon. Weapons - from shotguns to Israeli machine guns and RPGs - have been smuggled en masse. 

It's no secret in Syria that armed gangs - from Salafis to petty criminals - have been attacking regular soldiers, the police and even civilians since the early stages of the protest movement. Of roughly 3,500 people killed during the past seven months, a large number of civilians and more than 1,100 soldiers were killed by these gangs.  

Russia sends flotilla to Syria

VLADIMIR RADYUHIN Hindu 30N11 

Russia next week will dispatch a flotilla of warships, including its navy flagship, to Syria, where the United States has already deployed a naval force.

A Russian battle group, consisting of three vessels led by the heavy aircraft-carrying missile cruiser, Admiral Kuznetsov, will embark on a two-month voyage to the Mediterranean on December 6, a senior Defence Ministry official told the Interfax news agency on Wednesday.

The news of Russian naval deployment came shortly after the U.S. nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS George HW Bush anchored off Syria, along with additional naval vessels.

The defence official in Moscow insisted that the Russian mission has no connection with the ongoing crisis in the region and was planned long ago. He said the warships will conduct drills in the Atlantic and the Mediterranean far from Syrian shores and will return to their Northern Fleet base in early February. However, the ships will call on the Russian naval base in the Syrian port of Tartus to replenish supplies of food and fuel.

A former Russian naval commander said that Moscow was sending a message to the U.S. and European leaders.

"Having any military force other than NATO's is very useful for the region because it will prevent the outbreak of armed conflict," former Chief of Naval Staff, Admiral Viktor Kravchenko, told a Russian daily.

Last week unconfirmed reports said that three Russian warships had already anchored near Syrian shores, but Russian officials refused to confirm or deny the reports.

The Russian naval mission to Syria comes at a time of renewed tension in Russian-American relations. President Dmitry Medvedev has recently warned that Moscow would deploy new missiles and take other retaliatory steps if the U.S. goes ahead with its plans to build missile defence systems in Europe that could threaten the Russian nuclear deterrent.

Russia has also announced plans to resume defence cooperation with Cuba after a break of 20 years. The Russian Trade and Industry Ministry is negotiating a contract to set up a munitions facility near Havana to produce cartridges for the Kalashnikov assault rifles, a leading Russia business daily reported on Wednesday. Defence experts said the deal signalled Cuba's plans to modernise with Russia's help the vast arsenals of weapons the Soviet Union supplied to the "Freedom Island" between 1961 and 1991, when defence cooperation between the two countries wound up
 
Tehran invokes revolutionary fervor 
By M K Bhadrakumar  Asia Times 1 December , 2011

On Monday, Iran's powerful Guardian Council endorsed the Majlis' resolution adopted the previous day to downgrade the country's ties with Britain. The speed with which the process gathered momentum conveys the message that it carries the stamp of a decision at the highest levels of the Iranian leadership. 

That and the overwhelming mood of support for the move within the Majlis also indicate that the locus of power in Iran is shifting to a hard line. 

The move includes expelling the British ambassador in Tehran and downgrading the representation to the level of charge d'affaires. By Tuesday afternoon, dozens of Iranian protesters forced their way into the British compound in Tehran, tearing down the Union Flag and throwing documents from windows. A signpost has been put up in Tehran that can be ignored only at some peril. 

The protesters raised three main slogans: "Down with Britain", "Down with America", and "Down with Israel". They carried photographs of Iranian scientist Majid Shahriari and the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps commander Major-General Qassem Soleimani. Tuesday was also the first anniversary of Shahriari's murder, which was believed to have been carried out by Israel's Mossad with the support of Britain's Secret Intelligence Service, MI6. 

Asymmetrical response
But the tipping point must be London's steps toward removing the Mojahedin-e Khalq (MKO) from the list of terrorist organizations. The MKO has been responsible for some of the most devastating terrorist attacks in the history of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran holds the MKO responsible for more than 17,000 killings over the years. The most "celebrated" were of course those of Ayatollah Muhammad Behesti (who was next only to Imam Ruhollah Khomeini in the pantheon of the revolutionary leadership) in June 1980 and of the popularly elected Iranian president Muhammad Rajayi in August of the same year. The second terrorist strike came close to eliminating the entire revolutionary leadership under Khomeini. 

It must be one of the quirks of modern history that Western intelligence has depended on the MKO, which practices an ideological mix of Marxism, nationalism and Islam, as the principal instrument to subvert the Islamic regime in Iran. Iranian security personnel and Lebanon's Hezbollah busted in a major counterintelligence operation in Beirut the entire network of the US Central Intelligence Agency in Lebanon and Iran. 

The CIA was apparently using Lebanon as the "gateway" to penetrate Iran, given the relative freedom of movement between the two countries. Through May and June, Iranian security officials arrested more than three dozens Iranians who were working for the CIA. Their interrogation revealed that recent covert operations against Iran were the joint ventures of the CIA, Mossad and the MKO. 

Thus the British move to rehabilitate the MKO (whose leadership is based in Brussels and is allowed to travel freely to the European capitals) has infuriated Tehran to no end. It seems to be the real reason behind the present crisis. Tehran is resorting to "asymmetrical" response by striking at the symbol of British power because it lacks the capacity to pay back to London in the same coin. 

A deep chill is setting in with Iran's ties with Britain. The relationship has been a hugely troubled one historically, the high-water mark in recent history being the coup leading to the overthrow of the government of Mohammed Mossadeq in Iran in 1952, which is commonly attributed to the CIA but was actually the handiwork of MI6. And Iran remembers it. Iran knows better than most countries that Britain continues to be the "brain" behind America's policies - be it toward Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria or Myanmar. 

Britain will almost certainly take its grouse over the Iranian snub to the European councils and will seek a "regional" consensus in the Western world to make diplomatic moves against Iran in unison. The predictable pattern will be that given the heightened feelings in London, such countries as Germany that have extensive involvement in Iran will fall in line. All the same, it becomes an occasion to take the temperature on European unity when chips are down over the Iran situation in the coming months. 
This, in a manner of speaking, will also be the trial run for the Middle East. The lines are being drawn as the night of the long knives begins. Everyone understands it. And for the autocratic regimes in the Persian Gulf, there will be no corner to go and hide in. The hurried visit by King Abdullah of Jordan to Israel shows the panic over the gathering storm. Saudi Arabia's robust efforts to divide the region on Sunni-Shia sectarian lines haven't succeeded. The Arab street will find it difficult to accept the Western push against Iran. That is the thought worrying Abdullah most. What if this mass indignation erupts in Jordan? 

The United States and Israel will no doubt work overtime in the European capitals to get the West to downgrade ties with Iran and if they succeed, they will beat the drums that Iran faces "international" isolation. But it may have no value other than propaganda. Clearly, Tehran has factored in the downstream diplomatic fracas that will follow by insulting Britain, and is nonetheless going ahead with its decision to downgrade ties. 

So, what is on the Iranian mind? Some serious conclusions can be drawn. First, Tehran estimates that a US-British-Israeli axis is in any case gearing up for a confrontation. The strategic ambiguity - "all options are on the table" - no longer exists really, after the hardline policy speech by US National Security Adviser Tom Donilon at the Brookings Institution in Washington last week. 

Evidently, Donilon spoke up for President Barack Obama, fully mindful of the criticality of an already supercharged Middle East situation:
We have enhanced our significant and enduring US force presence in the region. In addition, we have worked to develop a network of air and missile defenses, shared early warning, improved maritime security, closer counterterrorism cooperation, expanded the programs to build partner capacity, and increased efforts to harden and protect our partners' critical infrastructure. 

The steps demonstrate unmistakably to Tehran that any attempt to dominate the region will be futile. And they show the United States is prepared for any contingency ... President Obama has said as recently as last week, we are not taking any options off the table in pursuit of our basic objectives.
Second, Tehran estimates that this confrontation may take place within Obama's first term as president - because it may well ensure the success of his bid for a second term. The manner in which the Obama administration jacked up the tensions with Iran almost in parallel with the commencement of his re-election bid hasn't escaped Tehran's attention. Third, emanating out of the above, Tehran has little choice left but to take to the high ground, as it is no longer a matter of Iran being flexible on the nuclear issue or not, of Iran being conciliatory toward Israel or not, or of Iran being "moderate" on the Palestine problem and the Arab-Israeli conflict or not. 

It is pure power play and realpolitik. A similar situation arose in 1980 when Tehran couldn't care less anymore what the US and Britain thought of its revolution, and Tehran feels today once again that it is far better off without the British hanging about. The Iranian historical consciousness still regards Imperial Britain as a poisonous serpent that every now and then crept up from India to devour the succulent Persian fruit. 

Collective memory 
The animus against Britain comes out clearly in the statement issued by the student protesters who stormed the embassy: The embassy of the old fox should have been occupied much earlier. Every free-minded Iranian whose heart is beating for this land and has observed the crimes of the old colonialism against Iran and the Iranians should know that occupation of the embassy of the old fox serves the interests of Iran and our country's national interests. 

The recent statements by Iranian military commanders have warned that Iran has known (and unknown) capabilities to retaliate if attacked. By warning explicitly, it hopes to inject some rational thinking into the US-British-Israeli discourses that are bordering on delusional estimations regarding Iran's policies and choices. But Tehran senses the futility of trying to influence the undergirding of the Obama administration's disposition anymore in the near term. 

In the Iranian estimation, Obama is simply not interested in hearing Iran's narrative. His obsessive concern is his 2012 re-election bid, and his campaign interests lie in diverting the locus of the political discourse away from his failings in mending the US economy. A regime change in Syria and a move toward cracking down on the Hezbollah are just the kind of decisive leadership that he needs to project to get over the image that he "leads from the rear". 

With an amazing degree of belligerence, Donilon continued in his speech at Brookings: The end of the [Bashar al-] Assad regime [in Syria] would constitute Iran's greatest setback in the region, a strategic blow that would further shift the balance of power in the region against Iran. Tehran would have lost its closest ally in the region. To be sure, the "revolutionary" mood in Tehran is developing against the regional backdrop. Tehran links Donilon's belligerence with the stationing of the nuclear aircraft carrier USS George H W Bush off Syria. The US 6th Fleet is also patrolling the eastern Mediterranean off Syria. The US and Turkey have asked their nationals to leave Syria. 

Again, US Vice-President Joseph Biden has arrived on a surprise visit to Iraq, en route to Turkey on a mission to display US backing for Ankara's interventionist role in Syria. Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmed Davutoglu hinted for the first time on Tuesday that his country was ready for an intervention in Syria. 

According to Britain's Daily Telegraph newspaper, a secret meeting was held in Istanbul last Friday between Turkish officials and representatives of the Libyan "opposition" to work out the logistics to bring Libyan fighters who were trained and equipped by the West to fight in Syria. 

There are reports in the Russian media that the first contingent of 600 Libyan fighters may have already been transferred to Syria. The dilemma facing Turkey and its Western allies is that the Syrian armed forces have overwhelmingly remained loyal to the regime. Thus the fig leaf of Syrian "resistance" is unavailable, which in turn would expose the gamut of the outside intervention. The Libyan fighters are expected to make up for this operational deficiency. 

In short, the writing is there on the wall that a Western intervention in Syria led by Turkey is shaping up. France has openly called for creating a European Union-backed humanitarian corridor that would allow Western intelligence and military advisers to move through Turkey into Syria and mastermind the regime change. Turkey was specially invited to the EU foreign ministers' meeting in Brussels on Tuesday. 

All in all, Tehran is left in no doubt that the time has come to switch the Iranian nation into a revolutionary mode. The intrusion into the British Embassy invokes archetypal symbols of defiance and resistance, which are embedded in the Iran's revolutionary consciousness - especially when the collective memory about Britain is summoned. It is Iran's ultimate line of defense - as was the hostage crisis with the US in the months following the revolution when Iran came under siege. 

Clearly, Obama, who has a panache for taking political gambles - and has so far won in a meteoric political career - is on a slippery path. Syria is a hard nut to crack; Hezbollah is waiting in the wings; so is Hamas. The odds are 50-50 that things may not happen the way Donilon tried to persuade us to anticipate, even if they may not be an exact replay of the outcome that horrified Jimmy Carter. On Tuesday afternoon, the US-Iran standoff moved to a flashpoint. 

Ambassador M K Bhadrakumar was a career diplomat in the Indian Foreign Service. His assignments included the Soviet Union, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Kuwait and Turkey. 




Saudis fear there will be ‘no more virgins’ and people will turn gay if female drive ban is lifted



Saudi Arabia's highest religious council and the illustrious genius
professor Subhi,  belong in the highest security mental asylum!

-Kalim



"Repealing a ban on women drivers in Saudi Arabia would result in 'no
more virgins', the country's religious council has warned.

A 'scientific' report claims relaxing the ban would also see more
Saudis - both men and women - turn to homosexuality and pornography.
The startling conclusions were drawn by Muslim scholars at the Majlis
al-Ifta' al-A'ala, Saudi Arabia's highest religious council, working
in conjunction with Kamal Subhi, a former professor at the King Fahd
University."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2068810/Saudis-fear-virgins-people-turn-gay-female-drive-ban-lifted.html

Saudis fear there will be 'no more virgins' and people will turn gay
if female drive ban is lifted

Khawaja Asif, Memogate, & Brigadier (R) Niaz.

FROM MR AAMIR MUGHAL A RETIRED INTELLIGENCE BUREAU OFFICER

Khawaja Asif, Memogate, & Brigadier (R) Niaz.


ISLAMABAD: Admitting Nawaz Sharif's petition on the memogate scandal for hearing on Thursday, the Supreme Court issued notices to the president, the army chief and others party to the case, DawnNews reported. The court moreover directed the authorities to submit a report on the issue in 15 days' time along with barring Husain Haqqani from leaving the country. A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry issued the directive. During the hearing, Pakistan Muslim League – Nawaz's chief Nawaz Sharif told the court that the secret memo was approved by the country's top political leadership. He further said that if a similar scandal had propped up during his government, he would have tendered his resignation. Sharif claimed that a force was stopping Pakistan's parliament from functioning independently. During the proceeding, Justice Jawad Khwaja said that the memo scandal was so far based on assumptions and determining the facts of the matter was obligatory. Moreover, Justice Saqib Nisar questioned whether the memo case fell under the jurisdiction of the court or that of the parliament. Responding to which, Sharif said that the parliament was not functional and was only passing resolutions. He added that the parliament was not going to do anything regarding the scandal. Chief Justice Iftikhar said the scandal had civil and military implications and that military courts had the authority to act on the information. He further said that newspapers had been reporting that the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) had investigated the issue, adding that Husain Haqqani's resignation did not prove the charges that were being levelled. Also, Sharif asked the court to summon every individual suspected of involvement in the case to determine where the responsibility lay. REFERENCE: Nawaz claims memo approved by top political leadership http://www.dawn.com/2011/12/01/nawaz-claims-memo-approved-by-top-political-leadership.html

Thursday, December 01, 2011, Moharram-ul-Haram 05,1433 A.H. Updated at: 1400
http://jang.com.pk/jang/dec2011-daily/01-12-2011/u88987.htm










Thursday, December 01, 2011, Moharram-ul-Haram 05,1433 A.H. Updated at: 1700 
http://jang.com.pk/jang/dec2011-daily/01-12-2011/u89011.htm



ISLAMABAD: Former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif succeeded in pushing back the memogate affair under the spotlight as he and his party members dubbed the Parliament a failure before a nine member larger bench of the Supreme Court (SC) on Thursday. On several occasions, before finally ordering a probe into the scandal, judges reminded Sharif and his party members to limit their submissions to the legal arguments. The Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) chief said he would not have been wasting the court's time had the parliament been keeping its word on matters involving the sovereignty and security of the country. "Neither the resolutions of the parliament and the parliamentary committees were implemented nor the joint sessions of the parliament succeeded in achieving its purpose," Sharif said. Nawaz, while providing evidence in the absence of his lawyer, said that Pakistani American businessman Mansoor Ijaz has proved that the memo was written after the approval of a "higher authority in Pakistan". The SC on Thursday gave the respondents in the memogate scandal case 15 days to submit their evidence to the apex court. A notice was issued in this regard by the Chief Justice of Pakistan Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry, who said that all parties named in the petition must present their evidence in order for the memogate scandal to be investigated. Justice Iftikhar noted that the case comes under the ambit of civil and criminal law. The petition names 13 respondents including President Asif Ali Zardari, Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Ashfaq Pervez Kayani and the Director General of the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). The president's secretary, the prime minister's principal secretary, foreign secretary, defence secretary, interior secretary, secretaries of all provincial governors and the chief secretaries of all provinces are also among the respondents. The court also said that former Ambassador Husain Haqqani, who has resigned over the matter, should not leave the country till the court's decision is announced. PML-N Senator Ishaq Dar, one of the petitioners in the case, was asked by the judges about the mandate of the 'Parliamentary Committee on National Security', which had been tasked with investigating the memogate affair. Dar said the committee did not have any constitutional backing and may not be able to initiate action against the culprits. "Such committees seldom put in real work and are formed only to sit and talk," added Dar. He said the parliament should understand it would cease to exist if it failed to have its decisions implemented. The PML-N has filed at least seven petitions for bringing to book the characters behind the memo affair after holding an independent probe. The Attorney General (AG) of Pakistan Maulvi Anwarul Haq, defended the parliament and said the committee set up for investigating the memo affair was validly formed and its findings should be given weight. Justice Saqib Nisar observed if the AG was trying to say that the SC should not order a probe because the parliament was to begin investigation. "All I am saying is that the parliamentary committee has been empowered to collect the evidence in this important affair. The court should wait for the findings before ordering an independent probe," the AG pleaded. REFERENCE: Memogate: Parliament failed to protect sovereignty says Nawaz By Express / Faisal Shakeel Published: December 1, 2011 http://tribune.com.pk/story/300607/memogate-respondents-to-submit-reply-withing-15-days-says-cj/  
History & Memory Loss of Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif & Khawaja Muhammad Asif 
Khawaja Muhammad Asif Speech on Pakistan Army - 1 (2007)


LONDON: PML-N President Mian Shahbaz Sharif has confirmed that during his meeting with the trusted friend of President Pervez Musharraf, Brig (retd) Niaz, shortly before his arrival in Britain, both had discussed "important political matters" of Pakistan, but no secret message was delivered to him from the presidency. In an exclusive interview with The News after his arrival in London, Shahbaz said he had visited the residence of Brig Niaz, as he was not only their family friend but a well-wisher too. Explaining the nature of his meeting which triggered reports that perhaps once again Brig Niaz was out to bridge the gap between his common friends, the Sharif brothers and Musharraf, Shahbaz said he had visited his house to pay a courtesy call. He said since he went to Pakistan in November last year, he had not met Brig Niaz, who was respected and admired in his family. He said he had come to know that Brig Niaz was ill and he went to inquire about his health. When asked whether Brig Niaz had delivered any message of Musharraf in the changed situation, Shahbaz denied it outright and said no such message was given to him. To another question if he had discussed the current political situation with Brig Niaz, Shahbaz said, "Definitely, the political situation was discussed during the meeting and we both exchanged our political views on all the issues confronting Pakistan." "Of course, when we meet, like common Pakistanis, we also discuss the current political situation. It was very natural to discuss the prevailing political situation in the country," said Shahbaz while defending his conversation on political issues with the trusted friend of General Musharraf. Asked whether being an elder and old friend, Brig Niaz gave him any political advice about the political course the Sharif brothers should take now, Shahbaz replied that he always gave them advice that we all should work for the betterment of Pakistan. "I hope, Brig Niaz was giving similar advice to his friend General Musharraf, too," Shahbaz said. When told that his meeting with Brig Niaz had given currency to reports that finally the PML-N was bridging its gap with Musharraf, Shahbaz rejected this widely-perceived notion and wondered how one could draw such kind of wild conclusions. He argued that one could have common friends and it did not mean that there was any new deal or arrangements in the making with Musharraf. To support his argument, Shahbaz said: "Now PPP senator Farooq Naik happened to be the brother-in-law of PML-N leader Khawaja Mohammad Asif. Does it mean that we should dismiss Khawaja Asif from our party, as he is related to a senator of PPP?" Asked whether there was any possibility of his meeting with Musharraf in London, Shahbaz said: "Absolutely not". When told that Brig Niaz was reaching London and whether he would meet him during his stay here, Shahbaz replied he had no idea whether Brig Niaz was also in London. When asked whether the PML-N would become a part of a national government after the general elections in the country as proposed by Asif Zardari, Shahbaz said it was too early to comment on what would be the response of his party. However, he said both the political parties had a working relationship and both had signed the Charter of Democracy in London, which might become the basis of cooperation in the future. He reiterated the demand that a neutral and independent government should hold free and fair elections in the country and the Election Commission should be strengthened to ensure transparency of polls. Shahbaz said by visiting the General Hospital Rawalpindi to mourn the killing of Benazir Bhutto on December 27 followed by his visit to Naudero, Nawaz Sharif had saved the federation. REFERENCE: Shahbaz admits political dialogue with Brig Niaz Rauf Klasra Friday, January 18, 2008 http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=12368&Cat=13&dt=1/17/2008

Khawaja Muhammad Asif Speech on Pakistan Army - 2 (2007)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzQDHnuePoI


ISLAMABAD: Brig (retd) Niaz, a friend of President Pervez Musharraf, had more than once facilitated return of some female members of the Sharif family to Pakistan in the past to attend to family affairs. He had no acquaintance with the Sharif family until he was approached by a common friend a few years ago, seeking his help in facilitating travel of female members of the Sharif family to Pakistan through his good offices with President Pervez Musharraf to attend marriages of their relatives. Sharifs were then in Jeddah. "I was groomed in an environment that doesn't allow being discourteous with anybody expressing his desire to meet him," the former brigadier had told this correspondent before Nawaz made an abortive attempt to return to Pakistan on Sept 10 last year. Niaz met the Sharifs in London where he had primarily gone for treatment. The soldier had sought that since he was an apolitical person he should be spared from being embroiled in any controversy. He did not agree to a record chat, but consented to tell the story about his contacts with Sharifs and how relations between Musharraf and him built up. Before his failed attempt to return to Pakistan, Nawaz Sharif was thrashing Musharraf in his live news conferences in London. At that point, one clearly noticed that Niaz was greatly distressed by Sharifs' diatribe against Musharraf. But he was helpless and felt embarrassed. His last encounter with Sharifs in London had turned out to be a futile exercise when he failed to convince Nawaz Sharif to delay his return to Pakistan for some time. However, when the common friend had urged Niaz to talk to the president, he was quick to say yes. He had met Musharraf and secured the requisite go-ahead for Sharifs to attend marriages in their family. The six feet-plus tall former brigadier, originally hailing from Chakwal, one of the main recruiting areas of the Pakistan Army, faced no difficulty in obtaining the president's consent for Sharifs to come back, saying that female members should not suffer for the faults of their male elders. During his meetings with Sharifs, Niaz had been urging them to show restraint towards the president, realising the grave situation in Pakistan. But the two brothers had never practically did that and kept on with their rhetoric. Niaz again hit the headlines last week when Pakistan Muslim League (PML-N) president Shahbaz Sharif met him at his Islamabad residence. This was basically meant to thank and show respect to the former brigadier for facilitating the Sharif family at the most difficult time for a private affair. "This was basically a courtesy call from Shahbaz, who was meeting people that had come to their rescue during their time in exile," a PML-N leader told The News. "Like Niaz's previous encounters with Sharifs, this one, too, failed to moderate them. Niaz, however, did stress that Sharifs should lower their temperament," he said. When one had met Niaz, the judicial crisis was at its peak and Musharraf had been pushed to the wall. The former brigadier was extremely distraught over the point where Musharraf had gone because of the immense public pressure. He was also displeased with what a set of judges of the Supreme Court and his detractors were doing against the president. Particularly, Sharifs unhealthy role in the whole situation disturbed him a lot. He gave the impression as if his mission miserably failed. Cigar-smoking Niaz did not know Musharraf at all till a former colonel, who was his and the president's friend, arranged a meeting between them. This is how the two became friends. Niaz was penniless when he had to leave the Army in 1977 for his refusal to fire at protesters during the limited martial law in Lahore. He was extremely worried about how he and his children, including a blind daughter, would make both ends meet. He had no home, no other resources to fall back on. It was the then Chief of the Army Staff Mirza Aslam Beg who, knowing Niaz since long, enquired after his plight and came to know about his condition. He pushed him to involve himself in defence purchases. Niaz was reluctant, saying he has no experience in the field and did not know complexities of the business. Finally, he agreed and earned kudos. He later bought the present sprawling house in Islamabad. Wherever he went in army offices for business purpose, he found officers, who had been his students in the Army when he was an instructor. It turned out to be an easy sailing for him all around. Niaz, around 80, has been seriously ill for the past few years. He was suffering from memory loss and other brain problems that also resulted in significant weight loss. He has to give up some of his old habits, including cigarette smoking, but sought permission from doctors to smoke cigar, which was less injurious. He visits Britain off and one for treatment. REFERENCE: Brig Niaz: the man playing the informal go-between Tariq Butt Tuesday, January 15, 2008 http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=12308&Cat=13&dt=1/15/2008 

Khawaja Muhammad Asif Speech on Pakistan Army - 3 (2007)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eN091SeVdC8


LONDON: Brigadier (retd) Niaz Ahmed, a secret negotiator between Nawaz Sharif and General Pervez Musharraf since the former prime minister's days of exile in Jeddah, has reached London. The visit comes amid reports about revival of backdoor channels by the two parties to reach an understanding in the new scenario. Another Musharraf aide is also said to be on his way to London to revive contacts with Nawaz after the exiled prime minister, in a big departure from his seven-year-old stance, dropped a hint at a press conference here on Thursday that he was ready to sit with General Musharraf for the sake of a grand political reconciliation if the president quit power. It is being claimed here that the Musharraf camp, having left with little options following the SC verdict, is set to revive backdoor channels with Nawaz through a common friend Brigadier (retd) Niaz. The family members of Brigadier Niaz confirmed to The News from Islamabad that he was in London. When this correspondent contacted his residence in London, the inmates said Brig Niaz would be available on Monday. When contacted, Press Secretary to the President, Major General Rashid Qureshi told The News from Islamabad that he had no information about the revival of backdoor channels through Brigadier Niaz or for that matter Tariq Aziz visiting London. The News tried to contact Shahbaz Sharif for his comments, but he was not available. The Musharraf camp is said to be quite optimistic aboutr eaching an understanding with the Nawaz camp, after involving Brigadier Niaz, who is highly respected by the Sharif brothers for what he has done for them in the past. Sources said the first sign of flexibility in Nawaz Sharif's approach emerged at his Thursday's press conference when replying to a question, he said he was ready to sit with General Musharraf if he announced to quit power. This change is said to have given enough space to the Musharraf camp to revive the old links. Sources said the Musharraf camp might offer a safe landing to Nawaz in Pakistan. And he might be told that Musharraf is ready to take off his uniform before the presidential elections. But the PML-N should not resign from parliament as it had earlier announced. Nawaz might also be given an assurance that a level-playing field would be given to his party to contest the elections. But a source told The News that Nawaz might not be tempted to strike a new deal with Musharraf after winning a legal battle because he was not expected to get anything significant in return in case Musharraf continued in power and Benazir Bhutto captured the slot of prime minister. Sources said after the SC verdict, the Nawaz camp might not be ready to offer this big political price as by not resigning from the Parliament, the Sharif brothers might be agreeing to continuation of Musharraf in power and holding of elections under his supervision, something not acceptable to them and their charged followers. REFERENCE: Efforts on to revive Musharraf-Nawaz contacts Rauf Klasra Saturday, August 25, 2007 http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=9766&Cat=13&dt=8/25/2007&title=Efforts-on-to-revive-Musharraf-Nawaz-contacts

Kamran Khan & Shaukat Aziz discussing Saudi - Nawaz Sharif Deal.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqJrcYdCXJw


ISLAMABAD: In a significant political development President Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) Shahbaz Sharif will have an important meeting with President Pervez Musharraf's close aide and former instructor Brigadier (retd) Niaz Ahmad here in Islamabad today (Saturday). Brigadier Niaz Ahmad had been playing the role of envoy to President Pervez Musharraf in interacting with the Sharif brothers in recent months first in London and lately in Saudi Arabia. The PML-N president has come to the federal capital for the purpose and the meeting is expected to help reduce tension between the presidential camp and its arch critic, the PML-N leadership. It would be Shahbaz Sharif's third meeting with the brigadier after the Sharif family returned home from exile. The brigadier had been playing the role of go between former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and President Pervez Musharraf. Political observers are not ruling out a breakthrough between President Pervez Musharraf and Shahbaz Sharif within a day or two sequel to the meeting. Nawaz Sharif had expressed his willingness to meet the president conditionally early this week. He put the restoration of superior judiciary as the lone condition for such a meeting. Highly placed sources told The News Friday evening that PML-N is inclined to play a positive role in reducing the prevailing tension in the country so that polls could be held in a free atmosphere where the president would not feel any hesitation to hand over power to any party that could win the majority vote. The meeting would be a landmark occasion in view of the upcoming elections which are less than five weeks away. The Pakistan People's Party (PPP) has already softened its tone towards the administration to smoothen the atmosphere and concentrating on electioneering, the sources pointed out. It appears that all the stakeholders are in a reconciliation mood in the interest of holding the polls in a peaceful manner. The emanating threats to the country's nuclear programme and increasing suicide bombings that has hurt the social and economic fibre of the country are proving the source of motivation for the major political parties to help lower political temperature so that the enemy does not take advantage of the situation. President Pervez Musharraf is also following the path of reconciliation and his Thursday interview with a Singapore newspaper to hint at resigning if an impeachment motion was moved against him in the Parliament after the polls, is believed to be an expression of change of his mind. Brigadier Niaz Ahmad is the one who worked out details for return of the Sharif family to Pakistan in November last year. He assisted the team of the Presidential camp first in London and then in Jeddah for making their return smooth, the sources said. The president's former Chief of Staff General Hamid Javed led the Presidential team in the initial talks. The sources said that President Pervez Musharraf had marathon meetings with Brigadier Niaz Ahmad in Rawalpindi this week where vital national interests, especially the precarious security situation came up for discussion. The brigadier is widely respected in the army as he has taught almost every general currently sitting at the helm of affairs in the GHQ. He is in his late 80s and has unblemished record during the service of armed forces of Pakistan. He resigned on April 10, 1977 in Lahore when he was commanding the troops and martial law was imposed. He was ordered to fire at the people protesting against the government but instead of shooting at the innocent people he opted to resign there and then. In an exclusive chat with The News, Brigadier Niaz Ahmad said Friday evening that he has received a call from Shahbaz Sharif, who will be visiting him on Saturday. "I have no political ambition. I wish to serve my country that need healing handling. Every one of us must play our role at this critical juncture," the brigadier said in a sentimental tone. Brigadier Niaz has planned to leave for London tomorrow on a private visit. If there is any follow up meeting at a different level, it would take place before his departure for the UK, the sources opined. Interestingly, Nawaz Sharif is also in the proximity of the federal capital and Shahbaz will report to him immediately after the meeting. The Sharif brothers will evolve some strategy after the meeting today. They will also have consultations with their political allies and party leaders for any further action, the sources added. REFERENCE: Shahbaz meets president's aide today Muhammad Saleh Zaafir Saturday, January 12, 2008 http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=12238&Cat=13&dt=1/12/2008

Sharif Brothers, Brigadier Niaz, Musharraf and Saudi Arabia

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzxkBZQlPlw



















شریف خاندان مشرف کو کیا دے رہا ہے؟


علی سلمان
بی بی سی اردو ڈاٹ کام، لاہور
وقتِ اشاعت: Sunday, 25 November, 2007, 06:33 GMT 11:33 PST
http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/pakistan/story/2007/11/071125_nawaz_return_analysis_zs.shtml
http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/specials/1236_nawaz_agrmnt/index.shtml
http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/pakistan/story/2007/11/071125_nawaz_return_analysis_zs.shtml
Former Chief Minister of Punjab, Mian Shahbaz Sharif brother of Mian Nawaz Sharif. 'Listen to Shahbaz Sharif admitting deal'
http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediaselector/ondemand/urdu/meta/dps/2007/08/070822_shahbaz_interview?bgc=003399&lang=ur&nbram=1&nbwm=1&bbram=1&ms3=22&ms_javascript=true&bbcws=1&size=au&bbwm=1
http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/pakistan/story/2007/08/070822_agrmnt_nawaz_court_zs.shtml
http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/specials/1236_nawaz_agrmnt/page2.shtml
http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/specials/1236_nawaz_agrmnt/page3.shtml

Almost a Decade ago "Mr. Ansar Abbasi" had filed these News Reports on Mr. Nawaz Sharif and on PML (N) Governance in "Daily Dawn"


http://www.xnet.com.pk/cust-img/dawn_logo.gifhttp://1.bp.blogspot.com/_vW1GG83Zr1U/TPQV5kKkwfI/AAAAAAAAHHc/tthmWNskJMc/s400/Ansar%2BAbbassi.jpgISLAMABAD, April 25: Government agencies involved in the accountability exercise are said to be avoiding the processing of cases of alleged corruption or misuse of authority against members of the ruling PML, it is learnt. Investigations into the working of the Ehtesab commission and the interior ministry which are directly concerned with the accountability process under a statute, show that neither of them has been processing the references against PML leaders. According to sources, the two agencies have even been told to lay off certain cases. The sources claimed that some of the top PML leaders against whom references had been pending were Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, Sindh Chief Minister Liaquat Jatoi, Punjab Assembly speaker Pervez Elahi, former chief minister of the NWFP Pir Syed Sabir Shah, former Balochistan chief minister Zulfiqar Magsi, and former Punjab minister Raja Ishfaq Sarwar. Besides, a case against the NA deputy speaker, Jaffar Iqbal, was referred by an advocate from Multan to the Ehtesab Commissioner. But the commission has denied having received any formal reference in this regard.

A commission source, however, told this correspondent that the reference had actually been sent to the commission and it had been redirected to the provincial anti-corruption department for verification of the allegations. The Ehtesab Commission has so far referred a total of 54 cases to special benches of the high courts for trial. These include only two references against the PML leaders Chaudhry Sher Ali (MNA) and Jam Mashooq Ali (MNA). But both had been sent to the high courts much before the present government came to power. It is learnt that the agencies concerned have been told to keep a low profile in some cases involving bureaucrats and other top officials. The case of Raana Sheikh, former MD, PTV, for instance, has been pending with the interior division but they have been asked not to send it to the Ehtesab Commission, interior ministry sources told dawn. Later, the Accountability Cell of the PMs Secretariat suspended all these officers except the two Ahmad Riaz Shiekh and Chaudhry Sharif. The FIA administration, the sources said, wanted to move against these two officials but they had not only been saved but the authorities had also been asked to process the case of promotion of one of them. According to one source, these officers have set the condition that they will only go to FIA if the incumbent director general is removed. REFERENCE: PML leaders being excluded from Ehtesab process Ansar Abbasi DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending : 26 April 1997 Issue : 03/17 http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/1997/26Apr97.html#pmll
  
http://www.xnet.com.pk/cust-img/dawn_logo.gifhttp://1.bp.blogspot.com/_vW1GG83Zr1U/TPQV5kKkwfI/AAAAAAAAHHc/tthmWNskJMc/s400/Ansar%2BAbbassi.jpgISLAMABAD, Dec 27: The year 1998 has been one of the worst years for civil bureaucracy in Pakistan for mounting politicization, intensified inter-service rivalries, controversial promotions and non-resolution of outstanding issues. According to official sources, during 1998 well over 90 persons were appointed on political basis and were given key positions in the civil bureaucracy on the orders of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif. The political appointees include retired government servants and persons from open market. At least 13 persons were offered grade 22 positions; 17 were adjusted against grade 21 posts; 31 were offered grade 20; and the rest in other grades. These include the retired civil servants re-employed in violation of the rules and without fulfilling the conditions for re-employments. These political appointees also include those retired military officers who were re-employed without following the prescribed procedure. "Most of these appointments were irregular," a source said, adding the prime minister had been using his discretionary powers to make these appointments.

Political appointments in certain cases is allowed under the rules provided it is done in the public interest. However, during the year under review hardly any of these political appointments were made on the recommendation of relevant government agencies. "Everything has been travelling down from big office," a source said. The sources said transfer of bureaucrats remained a tricky issue and most of the appointments at key positions were made without consulting the government agencies which were supposed to initiate and regulate the transfers of bureaucrats. The establishment division, which is responsible for the career planning of the officers, has turned into a post office and is there only to stamp whatever is communicated to it by the prime minister's office. Under the rules the prime minister issues the transfer order for bureaucrats in grade 21 and 22. The rest is the jurisdiction of the secretary, establishment. But in case of the transfer of grade 21 and 22 bureaucrats the establishment division is the authority to identify the vacancy, look for suitable candidates and propose a panel of officers before the prime minister. The PM is then supposed to select one of the officers.

"But in actual practice no such exercise is done. Now everything is done by the PM's office who simply conveys as to who should be transferred against which position," a source said, adding during this year almost all the key positions like federal secretaries, chief secretaries, inspector generals of police (IGPs) and heads of different departments were decided without the knowledge of the ED. "The ED has been only bothered at the time of the issuance of notifications," the source said. Even in those cases where the secretary, establishment, is the competent authority, the PM office has been interfering to give the plum postings to 'blue-eyed' bureaucrats. Sources in the PM's office confirmed to this correspondent that most of these posting orders were issued by the PM's office on the wish of the parliamentarians and other influentials. The promotions have also been very controversial during this year. Most of the groups of the civil bureaucracy remained frustrated because of their bleak promotion prospects. The district management group, however, got good promotions. It got two promotion in grade 22, 14 in grade 21, at least 21 in grade 20 and others.

Information group officers, having very bleak promotion prospects, were happy during this year because of their en-block promotions. These promotions were made without following the statutory provisions. Disparity in the pace of promotion between different groups has further worsened. Bureaucrats, particularly belonging to the groups of office anagement/secretariat, information, military land and cantonment, railways, and commerce and trade, remained the worst as far as promotion is concerned. The government has set a new precedent during the year 1998 by giving out of turn promotions to at least four of its 'blue eyed' bureaucrats. Two juniors were promoted (in grade 20 and 21 respectively) in PSP; and one each in secretariat group (in grade 22) and DMG (in grade 20) without considering a brigade of their seniors. All these officers were promoted without following the statutory provision or fulfilling the prescribed procedure and in complete violation of government rules. Long-standing issues, like the fixation of share for different occupations in the secretariat group, remained unresolved. The issue is pending since the introduction of the 1973 administrative reforms. REFERENCE: Over 90 men appointed on political basis Ansar Abbasi DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending: 02 January 1999 Issue : 05/01 http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/1999/02Jan99.html#over


http://www.xnet.com.pk/cust-img/dawn_logo.gifhttp://1.bp.blogspot.com/_vW1GG83Zr1U/TPQV5kKkwfI/AAAAAAAAHHc/tthmWNskJMc/s400/Ansar%2BAbbassi.jpgISLAMABAD, Oct 6: The reported statement of the Punjab Chief Minister, Mian Shahbaz Sharif, in which he had accused the Taliban of backing sectarian violence in Pakistan, has stunned the high authorities here. The Foreign Office has formally regretted what it termed "the baseless speculation and incorrect reporting in some sections of the media, claiming that the Taliban government of Afghanistan is allegedly involved in recent incidents of terrorist violence in the country." Sources in the relevant agencies of the federal government have expressed complete ignorance about the availability of any intelligence report that could support what the Punjab CM was reported to have said in his talk with newsmen at Lahore on Tuesday. They said the Punjab delegation which had attended an inter-provincial meeting on Monday, a day before the CM's reported statement, did not mention a word about the Taliban backing the sectarian violence in Pakistan. There was absolutely no mention of the Taliban in the meeting which was called merely to discuss sectarianism," a source who attended the meeting said. The Punjab Chief Secretary, A.Z.K. Sherdil, however, told Dawn by telephone from his Lahore residence that some intelligence reports did suggest that religious extremists from Pakistan got training in Afghanistan and before joining sectarian violence in the country. He said these intelligence reports maintained that such elements received training in camps inside Afghanistan, had fought along with the Taliban against the Afghan opposition, and had infiltrated into Pakistan and were involved in sectarian violence. "We are quite concerned about this situation and want a comprehensive policy to check this movement across the Pakistan-Afghan border," Mr Sherdil said. He, however, denied that there was any mention, in these intelligence reports, about Riaz Basra's protection by the Taliban. The chief secretary said there was massive gun-running from Afghanistan to the tribal areas in Pakistan from where the weapons came to the NWFP and then supplied to other provinces. He said since the Pakistan-Afghan border was not properly manned, this practice continues. However, official sources in the federal government totally deny having seen any such intelligence report. But some sources believe that the Punjab chief minister who has recently returned from an "important US trip" had taken an initiative to dissociate Pakistan from the Taliban and Afghanistan. Meanwhile the Foreign Office, in a press statement issued here on Wednesday evening, regretted "the baseless speculation and incorrect reporting in some sections of the media, claiming that the Taliban government of Afghanistan is allegedly involved in recent incidents of terrorist violence in the country." REFERENCE:Shahbaz Sharif talks of intelligence report; flat denial by FO Ansar Abbasi DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending : 09 October 1999 Issue : 05/41http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/1999/09oct99.html#shah



http://www.xnet.com.pk/cust-img/dawn_logo.gifhttp://1.bp.blogspot.com/_vW1GG83Zr1U/TPQV5kKkwfI/AAAAAAAAHHc/tthmWNskJMc/s400/Ansar%2BAbbassi.jpgISLAMABAD, Aug 30: Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has ordered re-inquiry against an FIA official who investigated the foreign currency accounts of Mian Abbas Sharif, the younger brother of the premier, it was learnt. The PM set aside the findings of the investigation carried out by Sajjad Mustafa Bajwa, assistant director (under suspension). He also rejected the recommendations of a former secretary of interior who had exonerated Mr Bajwa and called for his immediate reinstatement. However, a deputy secretary of the interior ministry who was asked to reopen inquiry against Mr Bajwa refused. Now a joint secretary of the interior division Javed Raza, has been nominated the inquiry officer. REFERENCE: Nawaz orders fresh inquiry against FIA official By Ansar Abbasi DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending : 04 September 1999 Issue : 05/36http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/1999/04sep99.html#nawa


http://www.xnet.com.pk/cust-img/dawn_logo.gif
http://doddprize.uconn.edu/images/cpj%20low-res_logo.jpgWASHINGTON, June 1: The Committee to Protect journalists, a New York-based press freedom organization, is conducting an investigation into a "hit list" prepared allegedly by the Pakistan government. "We are looking into it," a CPJ spokesperson said, confirming that the list contains the names of 35 prominent journalists. According to the CPJ, the names were: Irshad Ahmed Haqqani, Rehmat Ali Razi, Anjum Rasheed, Suhail Warraich, Sohaib Marghoob and Roman Ehsan, (Jang Lahore), M. Ziauddin and Ansar Abbasi (Dawn Islamabad), Dr Maleeha Lodhi, Javed Jaidi, Nusrat Javed and Mariana Babar (The News Islamabad), Rehana Hakeem and Zahid Hussain (Newsline), Ejaz Haider, Khalid Ahmed, Jugnu Mohsin and Adnan Adil (The Friday Times), Mahmood Sham (Jang Karachi), Rashed Rehman (The Nation Lahore), Amir Ahmed Khan (Herald), Imtiaz Alam, Beena Sarwar, Shafiq Awan, Kamila Hyat and Amir Mir (The News Lahore), Abbas Athar (Nawa-i-Waqat Lahore), Kamran Khan and Shehzad Amjad (The News Karachi), Azam Khalil (Pulse), Mohammad Malik (Tribune), Imtiaz Ahmed (The Frontier Post Peshawar), Ilyas Chaudhry (Jang Rawalpindi), Naveed Meraj (The Frontier Post Islamabad) and Syed Talat Hussain (The Nation Islamabad). According to reports received by the CPJ, the federal government had decided to establish a special media cell comprising officials from the police, Intelligence Bureau and the Federal Investigation Agency to punish the journalists who have been writing against the government. Ehtesab Bureau Chairman Senator Saifur Rehman Khan would head this cell which would function simultaneously at Lahore, Islamabad, Karachi and Peshawar with its head office at Islamabad. REFERENCE: 35 journalists on govt's 'hit list'DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending : 05 June 1999 Issue : 05/23  http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/1999/05jun99.html#35jo


http://www.xnet.com.pk/cust-img/dawn_logo.gif
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_vW1GG83Zr1U/TPQV5kKkwfI/AAAAAAAAHHc/tthmWNskJMc/s400/Ansar%2BAbbassi.jpgISLAMABAD, Dec 12: The government did not consult the Cabinet but took into confidence the military elite while granting pardon to Nawaz Sharif and sending the family into exile. A well-placed government source confided to Dawn that the dramatic decision had been taken purely by the men in uniform. The matter was discussed in the closed circles of the military before being put to the corps commanders at their two-day meeting last week. Asked whether the matter was placed before the cabinet, the source said: "No". It was too sensitive a matter to be discussed by the cabinet, he added. The military elite's support to the idea came when it was explained that the pardon and the exile was being allowed following Saudi Arabia's request. It was said that the Saudi government had given assurance that the Sharifs would not take part in politics "for quite some time". "Besides, the Sharifs, too, had given the undertaking in writing not to take part in politics," the source said. Asked how Saudi Arabia would prevent any of the Sharifs to travel to London and issue political statements from there against the military regime, the source said: "If the Saudis can get the Sharifs freed, they can also make them behave accordingly. They (the Saudis) are very strict in their commitments."

The source, however, refused to accept that there was any Saudi "pressure" on the government to get the Sharifs off the hook. In reply to a question, the source said that those exiled to Saudi Arabia would remain there. "If anyone of them goes to some other country he would be bound to come back to the country of exile," the source said. "We have the best example of Idi Amin who lives in Saudi Arabia with his 19 wives but as a completely non-political entity." Persuading the government for pardon, the Saudi authorities had said that not only would it be an Islamic act to set Nawaz Sharif free after the payment of Qisas but it would also be politically helpful to the military regime. "We were told by the Saudis that they had also tried to get Zulfikar Ali Bhutto freed but Pakistan's response in negative had plunged the country in an unending political turmoil," the source said. He stated that the military government was expecting that the departure of Sharifs' from politics would set things, particularly economic situation, right for the country. The government, he said, hoped that the present state of "shock" and "uncertainty" would not last long. "Don't you agree with the idea of throwing the dirt out to get the house in order," the source commented. REFERENCE:Cabinet had no idea of exile deal Ansar Abbasi DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending: 16 December 2000 Issue : 06/48http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/2000/dec1600.html#cabi


http://www.xnet.com.pk/cust-img/dawn_logo.gif
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_vW1GG83Zr1U/TPQV5kKkwfI/AAAAAAAAHHc/tthmWNskJMc/s400/Ansar%2BAbbassi.jpg
ISLAMABAD, Dec 10: The exile of the Sharif family to Saudi Arabia following the pardon announcement by the government, has deprived the Raiwind dwellers of their 15 assets, worth billions of rupees. A spokesman for the government, Maj-Gen Rashid Qureshi, told Dawn on Monday that almost 80 per cent of the Sharifs' property had been "taken over" by the government. According to Mr Qureshi, the 15 assets that have been taken over by the government in return for providing a safe "exit" to the Sharif family include Rs300 million in cash; industrial assets including Brother Steel Mills; Ilyas Enterprises; Hudaybia Paper Mill; Hudaybia Engineering Company; Hamza Spinning Mills; residential property including the Model Town bungalow; three houses at Mall Road Murree; property at 135 Upper Mall Lahore; a plot at Model Town Lahore; a plot at Upper Mall, Lahore; agricultural property including 10.2 kanals of land at Khanpur Sheikhupura Road Lahore; 41 acres and 7 kanals of land at Sheikhupura; 14.2 kanals of land and another 35 kanals at Bhaipharu in Chunnian and 88 kanals of land at Raiwind.

The Raiwind palace of the Sharif family, which ruled the country for almost 15 years, has however not been Confiscated by the government. Mr Qureshi dispelled the impression that there had been any underhand deal between the government and the Sharif family. He said the government had simply responded to the repeated mercy petitions filed by the Sharifs. Contrary to what the Sharifs were pretending before the public and
in their statements to the media, Mr Qureshi said they had been writing to the government including the chief executive and the president, appealing for pardon.

"We were receiving their requests for mercy in the past three to four months particularly after the courts handed over decisions against Nawaz Sharif," he said. These requests were renewed recently following Nawaz Sharif's reported ailment. Mr Qureshi stated that since the chief executive had repeatedly said that he was not vindictive so he recommended to President Tarar that the imprisonment of the Sharifs be pardoned and turned into exile while the rest of the punishments including fines, forfeiture of property and disqualification should stay. When told that the people in streets felt as if they had been betrayed by the government for allowing a safe exit to the Sharifs, the government spokesman said, "the Government has actually taken a compassionate view of the situation and converted the imprisonment into exile." Qureshi dispelled the impression that a "deal" was 'brokered' either by a Saudi prince or was the exit the consequence of Saudi Arabia's pressure. REFERENCE: Sharifs lose 80pc of assets, says Qureshi Ansar Abbasi DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending: 16 December 2000 Issue : 06/48http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/2000/dec1600.html#shar

--
http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/